When was the rspca invented

The gallant Mr Broome was finding it increasingly difficult to attend the committee meetings and so Mr Gompertz dropped the words 'Pro Tem' and was elected official Honorary Secretary. Gompertz has often been described as an eccentric. He was certainly a remarkable man, with 38 inventions to his credit who was also a talented author.

He would never, he said, do anything that would cause suffering to animals and it was a creed he stuck to every day of his life, not only did he refuse to eat meat, but he would never ride in a coach because of the suffering to the horses. He not only endeavored to abolish dog-pits- where animals fought to the death for the amusement of the onlookers- but he tried to ban bull-fighting and bull-baiting; perhaps even more important, he arranged for committee members to hold regular meetings with magistrates in an attempt to make them realise the importance of enforcing Martin's Act.

And in this, of course, 'Humanity Dick' was only too eager to help. To Dick Martin must go the honour of being the first man in the world to force through any Parliament a law establishing as a legal principle that animals have certain rights.

A man of great urbanity and wit, of passion and perseverance, "Humanity Dick" was a tremendous character, as his portrait in the Society's boardroom shows. He had an amusing habit of lapsing into Irish brogue, especially if angry.

Annoyed once by an offensive report in the Morning Post about a speech of his, he waited for the editor, pointed out the offending passage and indignantly demanded, 'Sir! Did I ever spake in italics? He was also a fine duelist, and when King George IV visited Ireland at the time of an election, he solemnly asked 'Humanity Dick' which candidate would be returned, Martin bowed and replied, 'The survivor, Sire!

The only trouble was- more often than not the magistrates took no notice of the Act. Many regarded it as little more than a joke- or did until Dick Martin decided on a dramatic way to bring it to the public notice. He himself prosecuted a costermonger called Bill Burns with cruelty to an ass. Though Burns was obviously guilty, 'Humanity Dick' sensed that- as so often happened in those days- the magistrates seemed hesitant to convict. The magistrates were obviously bored, couldn't care less about the fate of a miserable donkey, and Martin suddenly realised that the case was about to be lost.

He never hesitated. Without a word of warning, he sent for the donkey. Before the astounded magistrates and court officials, the donkey was led into the well of the courthouse, where its wounds could plainly be seen.

Bill Burns was fined- and Dick Martin received all the publicity he wanted. An artist called Matthews painted a picture of the scene. Even better, the comedians in the music halls started singing a new ditty:. Much of the early success of the SPCA rested on its attempts to enforce Martin's Law, and from the earliest days the Society had employed an Inspector- indeed it seems that Mr Broome even employed a Mr Wheeler personally form when his first efforts to form the Society failed- until when it was successfully launched.

Wheeler was the first of the now famous corps of over British inspectors who today work for the RSPCA, and a year after the Society was formed, Wheeler asked for an assistant. No-one quite knows where the money came from, but a Mr Charles Teasdale was appointed and took 63 offenders, mostly from Smithfield Market, to court where they were successfully convicted. Alas, the money ran out, and Inspector Wheeler's services had to be dispensed with, though he seems to have continued working as a volunteer, and was presented with the Society's Silver Medal in recognition of his services.

By , however, there was more money in the bank- for the time being anyway, and two inspectors were appointed at a salary of 10 s. They expected trouble- and wisely took along a bodyguard of two strong men.

Together with Mr Henry Thomas, then Secretary of the Society- the party of five were waiting in 'The Swan,' a public house opposite the cockpit, when the 'cockers' launched a savage attack on them. Covered with blood, the men fought a retreating battle to another pub, 'The Brown Bear.

Slowly, the society was growing from strength to strength, and by one of the committee members, Sir John de Beauvoir, went to Paris where, with French help, a society was subsequently started. But it was in the following year that fortune smiled on the SPCA. It came in the form of a letter dated July 4, , from Kensington Palace, and it read:. And its enclosure, relating to the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to animals and Her Royal Highness very readily acceded to your request that her name and that of the Princess Victoria be placed on the list of Lady Patronesses.

Within two years the Princess was to become Queen Victoria and her encouragement of the Society's activities was immediate and generous. She not only permitted the society to add the important prefix "Royal" to its name, but when the RSPCA asked her permission to establish a Queen's Medal, Victoria herself carefully sketched a cat into the group of animals in the proposed design.

More and more branches were opened- in Dublin, Wakefield, Plymouth. Sister societies sprung up abroad, in the most unlikely places as the British pattern was copied in Germany, France, Austria, Belgium, Holland.

Many countries applied directly to the RSPCA for help in starting up similar organisations, though in many cases the Society did not wait for other countries to ask. It approached overseas powers through official channels, asking them to add animal welfare legislations to the laws of their country, while in some countries, local British residents took the initiative, starting societies in cities like Naples and Turin.

Now comes a fascinating slice of history even if it is a digression- the curious manner in which the RSPCA by chance became involved in leading the way to the formation of another great society-the NSPCC. The trail that was to help children can be said to have started in New York where-as a direct result of British efforts-magnificent work had been done in suppressing cruelty to animals in the US.

Our focus is no longer just on safeguarding animals under the Animal Welfare Act but has shifted to preventing animal abuse before it happens. To do this, we work with our communities and government to teach people about animal welfare and improve animal welfare laws. We know that New Zealand is a nation of animal lovers, and we believe that together we can make real change happen and create a community where all animals are treated with compassion and respect.

Watch this space for your next update! Print this page. Our British roots The movement to protect animals started at a time of great animal use - and abuse. Since , the RSPCA has sought to ensure 'the prevention of cruelty and the promotion of kindness' towards all animals. To this end, it sets itself clear sometimes legislative goals which it pursues often over long periods of time.

The UK has far more farm animals than it has domestic pets approximately million v Given their numbers, the welfare of farm animals cannot be ignored, nor can the final days of their lives. What is the point of a very thorough series of laws built up over the years to protect our farm animals throughout the whole of their life span, if we then shut our eyes to the final ten days, which can so easily involve stress, terror and finally a cruel and painful death?

Historically, a farmer's choice of market or abattoir was based on proximity. In recent times this has become less important as farming has become increasingly organised and profitable. As a consequence, food animals have been transported great distances often internationally in pursuit of profit.

Although it is perfectly possible to transport meat pre-slaughtered, demand for freshly and thus locally slaughtered meat has grown.

In , the RSPCA recognised that such meat would become more competitive as the single European market in would dissolve international borders as well as the duties paid for crossing them Figure 1. Not merely were European regulations inadequate, but they were not enforced either. The RSPCA had substantial evidence of journeys, some as long as 60 hours, where animals travelled in terrible conditions without food and water. They also knew of brutal abattoirs in countries such as Spain and Greece.

Appropriate legislation would come, not as laws from national governments, but as 'Directives' from the European Council of Ministers in Brussels in this case all the Agriculture Ministers from all the member states. As a leading European animal welfare group, there was a behind the scenes role in advising on animal welfare legislation.

It, along with other welfare groups, also looked to represent public opinion to the EU Agricultural Ministers. As a British organisation, its most direct course of action was to approach the British Agricultural Minister whose vote in The Council was significant. The British parliament is typically supportive of animal welfare.

In this case, however, support could not be guaranteed - this was not, after all, uncontroversial domestic pet legislation, but was something which had significant financial implications. One particular hurdle was the significant number of MPs who are farmers - at one point the Minister of Agriculture himself was a farmer.

There was strong political opposition. No government likes to give in to pressure and, perversely, perhaps this makes resistance imperative. No change could be conceded without a fight. Direct approaches to Government on transportation were therefore proving unproductive. Outside Parliament there were other barriers to progress. Its beneficiaries - producers, markets, hauliers and ferry companies - were keen to see it continue.

There was widespread support for the trade and the British government seemed far from committed to restricting it. This, of course, meant less representation by the British in support of improved welfare in Europe.

Given the government's temporary lack of prioritisation, it was essential to galvanise them and promote via the Minister for Agriculture the welfare of transported animals across Europe. The public were the key to success. Only through them could real pressure be put on the Minister of Agriculture. On the 4th July a public meeting was arranged by the Society for the Promotion of Public Morality to discuss the carefree colonial attitude towards animals. The main concern of people who attended the public meeting was the ill treatment of horses.

Formed in the Society in Canberra has been located on its current site at Weston, which covers approximately 1. The site comprises five main buildings, kennel space for about 60 adult dogs and puppies. Cage space and cat runs for 40 cats and kittens, bird aviaries, and stock yards.

The shelter also has dog and puppy training yards, a retail shop, a veterinary clinic for the shelter animals and office space for the 50 paid staff and more than volunteers who help with the day to day running of the centre.

Find the perfect pet to join your family now! Search for dogs, cats and other pets available for rehoming. Main navigation Get Involved Get Involved Our supporters are the reason we are able to care for so many animals. You are here Home About Us History.