Structured what if technique

Patient Safety Training and Education. Improvement Resources. About PSNet. All Content. Current Weekly Issue. Past Weekly Issues. Curated Libraries. The Fundamentals. Continuing Education. Training Catalog. Editorial Team. Technical Expert Panel. Copy Citation. Copy URL. PubMed citation. Appropriate prescribing of medications: an eight-step approach. February 7, Moving beyond misuse and diversion: the urgent need to consider the role of iatrogenic addiction in the current opioid epidemic.

October 1, Texting while doctoring: a patient safety hazard. December 18, Assessing the validity of prospective hazard analysis methods: a comparison of two techniques. View 3 excerpts, cites methods and background. A new tool for hazard analysis and force-field analysis: The Lovebug diagram.

Application of Bow-tie methodology to improve patient safety. Failure mode and effect analysis: improving intensive care unit risk management processes. View 1 excerpt, cites background. Design for patient safety: a systems-based risk identification framework. View 1 excerpt, cites results. Failure modes and effects analysis for testicular sperm extraction management process.

View 9 excerpts, cites methods and background. Development and evaluation of an electronic hospital referral system: a human factors approach. View 2 excerpts, cites methods. Integration of multiple methods in identifying patient safety risks. What would happen if it did? How likely? Define the requirements : Articulate the criteria for success Describe the system : Provide appropriate-level textual and graphical descriptions of the system or process to be risk assessed. A clear understanding is necessary and can be is established through interviews, gathering a multifunctional team and through the study of documents, plans and other records.

Assess the risks : With the use of either a generic approach or a supporting risk analysis technique, estimate the risk associated with the identified hazards. In light of existing controls, assess the likelihood that they could lead to harm and the severity of harm they might cause.

Evaluate the acceptability of these risk levels, and identify any aspects of the system that may require more detailed risk identification and analysis. Propose actions : Propose risk control action plans to reduce the identified risks to an acceptable level. Review the process : Determine whether the SWIFT met its objectives, or whether a more detailed risk assessment is required for some parts of the system.

Additional risk assessment : Conduct additional risk assessments using more detailed or quantitative techniques, if required.

Guideword Examples The facilitator and process owner can choose any guide words that seem appropriate. Guidewords usually stem around: Wrong: Person or people Wrong: Place, location, site, or environment Wrong: Thing or things Wrong: Idea, information, or understanding Wrong: Time, timing, or speed Wrong: Process Wrong: Amount Failure: Control or Detection Failure: Equipment If your organization has invested time to create root cause categories and sub-categories, the guidewords can easily start there.

Like this: Like Loading Published by Jeremiah Genest. Published May 8, May 8, Previous Post Whataboutism. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public.

Name required.